Hyderabad, India, & Secunderabad
Click to search
SEARCH IN
Help?
YOUR LOCATION
DINING AND ENTERTAINMENT
Events
Movies
Restaurants/Pubs
SHOPPING AND DISCOUNTS
Shopping
Sales
Yellow Pages
HOTELS AND VISITING
Hotels
Attractions
Top Spots
CLASSIFIEDS
Real Estate
Business Related
Auto | Vacancies
More
MY FULLHYD
Profile
Privacy
Password
More
CAREERS
Search Jobs
Post Résumé
Post A Job
Get Advice
COMMUNITY!
Blogs
Discussions
Personals
Chat
Home | Movies | Yogi Review
Sponsored Results
Planning to shift jobs?
For thousands of jobs in Hyderabad and elsewhere, click above!

Yogi

Yogi
This film is not showing in town currently. It is displaying since it is part of the fullhyd.com archives, having been screened in town in the past.
 
Overview User Ratings Editorial Review
[Editorial]
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
  NA
  NA
  NA
  NA
Editorial Suggestions
Can watch again - NA
Good for kids - NA
Good for dates - NA
Wait to rent it - NA

Editorial Review

 
And half a star there is for pain-stakingly incorporating just about every cliché ever in Telugu films.

Yogi looks like a film targetting people who went to sleep in early-1980 and woke up just now. And it will send them right back to sleep. It is so old-fashionedly melodramatic and so full of the exaggerated movie-family expressiveness of the period, it's an embarassment to current Telugu cinema as such. Some of the sentimental scenes are so in-your-face and contrived, you'll squirm in awkwardness even if you are completely alone in the theater. And if you do not watch this soon, you probably will be.

Eeshwar Prasad (Prabhas) is a village simpleton who wants to earn money to buy a pair of golden bangles for his mother Santhamma (Sarada) when his father (Chalapathi Rao) dies. He leaves for Hyderabad to do this, but a turn of events converts him into a big goon Yogi, who the entire city dreads.

Santhamma comes to Hyderabad searching for her son with no details of his address, and runs into Archana (Nayantara), a journalism student, who asks her to stay with her. The film then shows almost every cliché in Indian film history as the mother and son repeatedly keep passing within inches of each other but do not see each other. It feels, like we said, like you are watching a 1980 film.

The rest of the film deals with Yogi's wars with the gang ruling the city led by Saidulu (Subbaraju) and his mentor (Kota Srinivasa Rao), to protect the poor from them. It keeps getting interspersed with the mother-son sentimental thread, which manages to make even Sarada look bad. The scenes are so shabbily written, it looks like she's overacting. And anything other than stern looks is not among Prabhas' strong points, which makes this whole senti thing too heavy-duty for him to emote.

The wasted potential of Yogi is exemplified by the gross misuse of the heroine. The romance isn't there at all. We're not talking about esoteric, movie-criticish words like chemistry and soul - there is simply no romance. Yogi doesn't save Archana from any goons, they never fall in love, they never have any mushy conversations. She just imagines 4 duets with him, that's it. As she keeps stepping in 30 seconds before every song, it's so formulaic, it's sickens you.

Vinayak tries to make this an action-cum-sentimental tale, thereby widening the spectrum of potential audiences. Both are disasters. The action parts hardly make you resonate with them, and the anachronistic sentimental scenes make you feel embarassed with your own company, an example being a scene where Prabhas gets on top of a tree and Sarada starts dancing below. When you are making a 60-year-old woman dance, there has to be enormous thought in making it tasteful or even tolerable.

Yogi has no strong scenes, no strong villian, no strong heroine, and no strong hero. This film is primarily a script/creative/direction disaster, but Prabhas is still too much of a rookie for roles with elaborate emotional nuances. Nayantara has nothing to do. Sarada's plight is worse - she has to look childish.

The primary entertainer is Venu Madhav - he makes you split your sides. A spoof on Aparichitudu (yes, this thing is done to death, but to prevent you from making that observation, they make it themselves) with Sunil is riotous. The music will be forgotten faster than the film itself.

Vinayak is perhaps drawing the wrong lessons from his previous successes. Even high-grossing films have their negative points - they work since the positives outweigh the negatives. Putting the wrong reasons at the center of the radar screen and making new films around them is always risky.

With the exception of Tagore, Vinayak has been strictly conventional and "mass". His films depend on heavy-duty dialogues, bloodshed, and a hypothesis of what people in the outskirts and people in the B and C centers want to see. You can pull that off with some of the heroes, some of the time. If these successes teach lessons that are increasingly simplistic - as reflected in the script for Yogi - it can hurt.

Watch this if you need to, but hire a specialist first to help you lower your standards.

Also read: Lakshmi, Bunny, Samba, Tagore





Like the fullhyd.com reviews? Read more!
User Comments
[96 users]
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
  NA
  NA
  NA
  NA
User Suggestions
Can watch again - NA
Good for kids - NA
Good for dates - NA
Wait to rent it - NA
What Hyderabadis Say!
Showing 1 - 7 of 7
[ Positive Negative Newest Oldest Most Helpful Least Helpful ]
Vijay [ 12th Feb, 2007, 12:24pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
I Plea the directors and producers not to make such kind of horrible movies by keeping the B and C grade audience in mind and with specific commercial targets. These kind of movies will always play be a bad part on thier careers.



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Srinivas Reddy [ 31st Jan, 2007, 8:36pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
beckar movie



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Naveen Mannava [ 16th Jan, 2007, 10:18am | Permalink ]
0 votes
Such horrible movie...crap...its not at all a prabhas movie... see chatrapathi..can not campare. what happen to VV.Vinayak...where the charm of DIL...such an idiotic movie...please donot waste time by watching such movies...very disappointed...waiting for munna.



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Pratap Reddy [ 16th Jan, 2007, 10:09am | Permalink ]
0 votes
Actually you people should have had some sense to watch a Kannada Remake... lol... that industry is an example of creative bankruptacy and when movies are hits in Karnataka you need to assume that the concept was lifted from somewhere or the movie is low-class. On the contrary Malayalam movies have lots of script writing and genuine intelligence involved. Understand this when you go to a remade movie.



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Dina Kyas [ 16th Jan, 2007, 6:35am | Permalink ]
0 votes
Such a horrible movie..This movie should have came in 80's, still it would have failed to attract any body..do not waste you precise time and money by watching stupid movies like this..



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Venkat Kishore Ryakala [ 15th Jan, 2007, 9:16pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
baaad review, dude/ette..what u call anachronistic i deem atavistic...it is morally pretentious of us to judge a cover by the book...umm...moving on, the actor has the emotional range of a teaspoon, granted, but it was an INTENTIONAL characterisation by the GENIUS that is this actor (i forget his name, prabhakar?..)..the heroine subtle yet IN-YOUR-FACE attempts at MILITARY level stalking followed by "oh, fancy meeting you here" moments show a keen understanding of military strategie on the part of the director, hats off to you sir...the entire movie is a keen and insightful commentary on the ethos and melodramatic grandeur of an earlier epoch in film-making juxtaposed with the dog-eat-dog sensibilities of this modern time...that the user squeams in his seat is but the INTENDED result of an implicit existential dilemma, the absurdist one, yanked to the conscious of the user by its nostril hair...yet in this explicitly agnostic review, you gloss over such subtle genious and you call it trite? no, good sir, this review is NOT the way to herald and highlight what is undoubtedly one of the finest cinematic experiences in recent times...I'm positive this opinion of mine will only be strengthened when I actually WATCH this movie...peace out, ryakala[AT]gmail.com



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Priyanka Rao [ 14th Jan, 2007, 8:21pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
The saddest part of the film is that I had to see a queue of more than 100 people waiting to see the next show and I was unable to stop even one. :-(. This movie is as ridiculous as any one can get.



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
See something wrong? Find something incorrect or missing on this profile? Suggest a correction!
ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertisers | Help | Contact Us | About Us | Submit An Event | Get Listed | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | We're Hiring

© Copyright 1999-2009 LRR Technologies (Hyderabad), Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. fullhyd, fullhyderabad and Welcome To The
Neighbourhood
are trademarks of LRR Technologies (Hyderabad), Pvt Ltd. The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material
in this site is protected by copyright law. You may not copy, distribute, or use this material except as necessary for your
personal, non-commercial use. Any trademarks are the properties of their respective owners.