Hyderabad, India, & Secunderabad
Click to search
SEARCH IN
Help?
YOUR LOCATION
DINING AND ENTERTAINMENT
Events
Movies
Restaurants/Pubs
SHOPPING AND DISCOUNTS
Shopping
Sales
Yellow Pages
HOTELS AND VISITING
Hotels
Attractions
Top Spots
CLASSIFIEDS
Real Estate
Business Related
Auto | Vacancies
More
MY FULLHYD
Profile
Privacy
Password
More
CAREERS
Search Jobs
Post Résumé
Post A Job
Get Advice
COMMUNITY!
Blogs
Discussions
Personals
Chat
Home | Movies | Hannibal Review
Sponsored Results
Planning to shift jobs?
For thousands of jobs in Hyderabad and elsewhere, click above!

Hannibal

Hannibal
This film is not showing in town currently. It is displaying since it is part of the fullhyd.com archives, having been screened in town in the past.
 
Overview User Ratings Editorial Review
[Editorial]
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
  NA
  NA
  NA
  NA
Editorial Suggestions
Can watch again - NA
Good for kids - NA
Good for dates - NA
Wait to rent it - NA

Editorial Review

 
Chinmayi Sirsi / fullhyd.com
Ever since I saw Jonathan Demme's "Silence Of The Lambs" (on TV, mind you, lending a whole new dimension to the phrase "glued to the television set") - wide-eyed, dry-mouthed and startled out of my wits, and my respect for movie-making rapidly taking giant leaps - I've wanted, oh so badly, to watch its sequel. Hollywood being far away from Hyderabad the sequel took its time to reach us, and this week I finally had my prayers answered. And how.

What a sequel Hannibal is - gloomy, dull, unintelligent and unforgivably boring. Someone should go right ahead and sue Ridley Scott, charging him with killing expectations and eating them for dinner. Neither the presence of Anthony Hopkins (as Hannibal the Cannibal, in case you are unenlightened), nor his grossly (in)human eating habits (pun! that's a pun!) could add any flavor (this gets better and better!) to the tasteless grub that Scott has dished out for his hungry audience. I believe this happened mainly since Hannibal lacks the right ingredients to make a good cannibal movie.

Take Julianne Moore, for one. The poor thing tries, but fails to fool you into believing that she could be the older version of the incredibly strong and painfully vulnerable Clarice Starling, played by Jodie Foster in Silence Of The Lambs. But Moore is the least of your worries as the movie first threatens and then goes on to fulfill its threat of becoming a cheap, cheesy horror-flick. Substantial blame can be rested on the slack, powerless and unbelievably ordinary script. And the dialogues.

For the benefit of those who haven't been fortunate enough to watch the Silence Of The Lambs, and for that of those fortunate enough not to have watched Hannibal, here's the story of the prequel. Clarice Starling, an FBI trainee, sort of befriends prisoner Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a man-eating psycho psychiatrist who helps her out in a horrible "Buffalo Bull" case in return for a "view" of the outside world. Hannibal then escapes.

10 years later, in Hannibal the movie, Clarice is back on the case. Also on the lookout for Lecter is Mason Verger, a horribly disfigured rich old man, Hannibal's only surviving victim who has sworn revenge. When Clarice gets disgraced by the force for "doing her job" well (an incident which leads her to be assigned to the Hannibal case), Hannibal writes to her to express his hope that they both might enjoy themselves.

Meanwhile, Inspector Renaldo Pazzi (Giancarlo Giannini) in Florence, Italy, chances upon the true identity of Doctor Bell (the great Hannibal himself) and pays dearly for it. The story then escalates into some more obscure nonsense, with wild hungry boars trained to eat men and fried brains (yuck!) for special effects. The result is not a happy one, especially since the end looks suspiciously like the beginning of another meaningless sequel.

Ridley Scott just couldn't leave well enough. In Hannibal, darkness and gloom try and fail to replace the sense of horror and disbelief you felt while watching its prequel. Simple, rather nonsensical dialogues replace those complex, thrilling and sometimes chilling exchanges between Lecter and Clarice. Cheap horror filmmaking replaces intense, clear-headed art. The abnormally intelligent, suave and sophisticated Hannibal Lecter is made out to be just another stupid, contemptible villain, and Clarice loses her strength as well as her vulnerability. If I were less angry, I might have said tut, tut, but this calls for a greater reprimand.

The performances are the saving grace, though there isn't much the actors can do to improve things. The make-up artists deserve mention, though, and so do the few scenes that make you go "yuck". As that's what they are intended for, I suppose they deserve some credit. The only other good thing about Hannibal is that it reminds you of Silence Of The Lambs (by playing dialogues from that movie into this one, under the pretext of Clarice reviewing the case - Scott's idea of making an independent sequel), and make you want watch it (Silence… not Hannibal) all over again.

All things considered though, you wish the makers of Hannibal had had the sense to avoid meddling with things they didn't understand. Some silences are better left undisturbed.





Like the fullhyd.com reviews? Read more!
User Comments
[17 users]
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
  NA
  NA
  NA
  NA
User Suggestions
Can watch again - NA
Good for kids - NA
Good for dates - NA
Wait to rent it - NA
What Hyderabadis Say!
Showing 1 - 5 of 5
[ Positive Negative Newest Oldest Most Helpful Least Helpful ]
The Mavericks [ 2nd Sep, 2001, 4:10pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
future movie reviews!

rush hour 2 4 stars
evolution nice funny movie ..worth a watch

Arficial intelligence - superb

tomb raider--- don`t under estimate it and compare it with movies like charlies angels..where women fight...this one is actually interesting..to watch..its not much like the game. but angelina joile or whatever!...is actually good looking
don`t miss this

scary movie2.. naa..not as good as part one..
i will be back with more!



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
The Mavericks [ 2nd Sep, 2001, 4:06pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
ok...don`t spend money to watch this in theatres...not worth more than a VCD watch..the music always kills the suspense....hey guys...watch out for Jurrassic park 3..nice one...but then again...don`t compare it with part 1...this one is " JUST" a thriller...no work for the grey matter in your brain



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Zafar [ 31st Aug, 2001, 11:39am | Permalink ]
0 votes
I watched Silence of the Lambs... and had big aspirations for the Hannibal... but having read Hyderabadees comments... I am having second thoughts...



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Zaphod Beeblebrox [ 28th Aug, 2001, 2:46pm | Permalink ]
0 votes
unpalatable....and dished out by ridley scott!!!!makes u wonder if this is the same guy who directed"Bladerunner"




 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
Manohar [ 28th Aug, 2001, 12:57am | Permalink ]
0 votes
Couldn't agree with the review more. It is nothing like "Silence of the Lambs".



 Was this comment helpful?
Very Helpful   Helpful   Somewhat Helpful   Not Helpful  
See something wrong? Find something incorrect or missing on this profile? Suggest a correction!
ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertisers | Help | Contact Us | About Us | Submit An Event | Get Listed | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | We're Hiring

© Copyright 1999-2009 LRR Technologies (Hyderabad), Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. fullhyd, fullhyderabad and Welcome To The
Neighbourhood
are trademarks of LRR Technologies (Hyderabad), Pvt Ltd. The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material
in this site is protected by copyright law. You may not copy, distribute, or use this material except as necessary for your
personal, non-commercial use. Any trademarks are the properties of their respective owners.